Hulk Hogan vermutlich entlassen!

[Nefercheperur]

Das wird jetzt einige schockieren, aber Hulk Hogan soll tatsaechlich gelogen haben, und das sogar unter Eid. Der National Enquirer hat eine Story in der steht das Hogan beim FBI und bei einer Anwaltskanzlei zwei Aussagen unter Eid zu der selben Sache machte. Bloed nur das Hogan zweimal unterschiedliche Aussagen zu der selben Sache angab, sprich eine Aussage davon ist falsch. Meineid ist in den USA ein Verbrechen und kann bei einer Verurteilung eine Gefaengnisstrafe von bis zu ueber einem Jahr haben (was aber selten vorkommt).
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrit...hulk-hogan

Einer der Anwaelte, Seth Berlin beschrieb die Sache so:

But what these documents show, and then I'll come back and I can talk a little bit about the exemptions and the indexes, but let me tell you what our concern is, Your Honor. So in this investigation what we know is that Mr. Bollea -- this is not -- I'm not treading on secret ground here. What we know is that Mr. Bollea came with his lawyer, Mr. Houston, to the FBI and asked for an investigation, which they conducted. And what we know from Mr. Hardy's last declaration is that part of this investigation yielded three DVDs that have encounters involving the three key participants in this -- Mrs. Clem, Mr. Bollea, and for portions of it Mr. Clem.

Each of those people has testified differently, they have all said different things about what actually happened, when it happened, how often it happened, whether -- what was known. And so one of the reasons why we said we would like to get -- we started by just saying look, we thought we would find, which we eventually got in yesterday's stack, statements by Mr. Bollea and his lawyer, and to see whether what he was saying to the FBI matched what he is saying in our lawsuit.

Turns out, without getting into the specifics, they don't, that we have essentially under oath testimony to the FBI and we have under oath testimony in our case directly at odds with one another. So we have a situation -- and it's very unfortunate that this is two days or one business day before we're supposed to start a trial on this matter, but we have a situation where the key participant, the plaintiff, is telling us one thing under oath and telling the FBI something else. So this is why we're asking -- and you can't use that document to impeach a person if there is a bunch of blanks in it that somebody is saying well, that's private even though it's already public.

Original von Axtmane
So ein gestörter Typ ... Aber: Unfassbar, wie die Menschenrechte in den USA behandelt werden, dass sogar private Telefonanrufe publiziert werden..

Gefaengniss Protokolle, solange kein Anwalt dabei ist, sind oeffentlich und koennen von jedem eingesehen werden, das muesste Hogan wissen, was ihn noch Mal daemlicher aussehen laesst.